The High Court held that in view of specific notifications, the matter requires adjudication under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. The court transmitted the record to the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal Registry and noted counsel's undertaking to appear there.
Record transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.255 of 2013-F
12.05.2015 Present: Mr. Raman Jamlta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. R.S.Verma, Addl.A.G. for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, CSG, for respondent No.3 In view of notifications No.G.S.R.926(E),
dated 29.12.2014 and No. Per (AP-B)B(15)-4/2015 dated 25.3.2015, the matter requires to be adjudicated under the provisions of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. As such, in view of Section 29 of the said Act, record be transmitted to the Registry of the H.P.State Administrative Tribunal, which now stands established.
Learned counsel for the parties undertake to communicate the order to their clients and appear before the Tribunal on 29th October, 2015.
Registrar (Judicial) to take appropriate action.
May 12, 2015 (Sanjay Karol), J. (Shankar)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matter requires adjudication under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Sanjay Karol
Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
