Rajeev Katoch v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013-G 12.5.2015 Present: None for the…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 165 of 2013-G
- 12.5.2015 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Adarsh Sharma, counsel for respondent No. 1.
Mr. D.K. Khanna, counsel for respondent No.2.
Mr. V.K.Verma and Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for respondent No.3.
The present is a service dispute and is only adjudicatable by the Administrative Tribunal. Accordingly, this writ petition is transferred to the State Administrative Tribunal. Learned counsel for the parties are directed to cause appearance before the Tribunal on 30.10.2015. Registry is directed to send down the record forthwith. Index be maintained and consigned to records.
May 12, 2015 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (GR) Judge
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether jurisdiction lies with the High Court or the Administrative Tribunal to adjudicate a service dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent No. 1
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/165/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court