Petitioner sought benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. Court directed respondents to examine the petitioner's representation and decide within six weeks.
Direction to respondents to examine petitioner's representation and decide within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.8254 of 2014 Date of decision: 14.11.2014
Hari Singh …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ….. Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr.Anil Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme (for short ‘scheme’), but the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for grant of the said benefit, despite representation.
2
goes against the petitioner, he is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law.
Copy dasti.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice
November 14, 2014 ( P.S. Rana ) (tr/vt) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the Assured Career Progression Scheme?
Hari Singh
Union of India
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
P.S. Rana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
