Disposed

Dhani Ram v. Union of India

Himachal Pradesh HC12 Nov 2014CWP/8256/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitioners claimed non-consideration of their case for benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh directed the competent authority to examine their representations and decide within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Representations to be filed within two weeks; competent authority directed to examine and decide within six weeks.

Dhani Ram Vs Union of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Himachal Pradesh HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.8255 of 2014 a/w CWP No.8256 of 2014 Date of decision: 14.11.2014

¶3

1.	CWP No.8255 of 2014
	Manohar Singh		…..Petitioner
	Union of India & others	Versus	….. Respondents
2.	CWP No.8256 of 2014
	Dhani Ram		…..Petitioner
	Union of India & others	Versus	….. Respondents

¶4

Coram:

¶5

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge Whether approved for reporting?

¶6

For the petitioner: Mr.Anil Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India.

¶7

Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)

¶8

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme (for short ‘scheme’), but the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for grant of the said benefit.

¶9

Issue notice. Mr.Ashok Sharma, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, waives notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶10

In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of these writ petitions with liberty to the writ petitioners to file representation(s) within two weeks from today before the

¶11

¶12

competent Authority and the competent Authority is directed to examine the same and make decision thereon, as per the rules occupying the field read with Scheme, within six weeks from the date of filing of the representation(s). Ordered accordingly.

¶13

It goes without saying that in case, the decision goes against the petitioners, they are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law.

¶14

Copy dasti.

¶15

( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice November 14, 2014 ( P.S. Rana ) (tr/vt) Judge

Dhani Ram v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhani Ram v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Msdelux Enterprises Vs Hpseb Ltd.

Karan Singh Vs State of Hp

Kashmir Singh Vs State of Hp

Hari Singh Vs Union of India