A writ petition seeking seniority and increment benefits for ad-hoc service was disposed of by this Court by accepting the petitioner's undertaking to file representations relying on a prior judgment.
Petition disposed upon undertaking to file representations within one month and seek extension within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 2827 of 2011.
Decided on: May 7, 2011.
| Rattan Singh. | Vrs. | State of H.P. & ors. |
|---|
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
For the petitioner:
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer:
“i) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to give the benefits of seniority and increments for the services which the present petitioner has rendered on the post of JBT on adhoc basis from 4.9.1985 to 19.11.1985 with all consequential benefits.”
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. May 7, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (karan/vs) Judge.
Rattan Singh
State of H.P.
Kurian Joseph
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
