This court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions to grant grace marks and eligibility for direct recruitment. The court directed the respondent to consider pending representations and pass appropriate orders within two months.
Direction to consider pending representations and pass appropriate orders within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 2792 of 2011.
Date of Decision : May 3, 2011
Jagdish Chand … Petitioner
Versus
H.P.S.E.B. … Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
For the petitioner: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate.
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:-
“i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant 3 grace marks to the petitioner and held the petitioner eligible for direct recruitment for the post of Assistant Accounts Officer w.e.f. the year 2009 with all consequential benefits.”
2
production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the respondent. Depending on the action, thus, taken on the representation, further action, if required, under law will also be taken within another one month.
of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice.
(Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge.
May 3, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)
Jagdish Chand
H.P.S.E.B.
Kurian Joseph
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
