High Court of Gujarat dropped contempt proceedings as the prayer in the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/953/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/10/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 953 of 2022 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 525 of 2019
============================================= MANUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL
Versus
N R PRAJAPATI DEPUTY COLLECTOR
============================================= Appearance:
MR PARVA MEHTA for VIRAL K SHAH(5210) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 for the Opponent(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 06/10/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR)
Mr. Parva Mehta, learned advocate for Mr. Viral K. Shah appearing for the complainants would fairly submit that the prayer sought for has become infructuous. Placing his submission on record, contempt proceedings stands dropped as the prayer sought for in the petition has become infructuous.
(ARAVIND KUMAR,CJ)
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
phalguni
Page 1 of 1
Manubhai Baldevbhai Patel
N R Prajapati
Aravind Kumar
Ashutosh J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
