This oral order by the Gujarat High Court directed Respondent No.3 to consider the petitioners' representations alongside the present petition within eight weeks of service, without examining the merits of the case.
Direction to Respondent No.3 to consider petitioners' representations along with the present petition within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/3008/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3008 of 2021
==========================================================
BHARATKUMAR KANTIBHAI PRAJAPATI
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR PRAKASH G PANDYA(3041) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 for the Respondent(s) No. ,2,3 MS JYOTI BHATT AGP for the Respondent(s) No.1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 15/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/3008/2021 ORDER
Colly.) along with a copy of the present petition with its annexures as additional representation in accordance with law within eight weeks after the copy of the present petition along with its annexures is served on the respondent No.3.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J)
Z.G. SHAIKH
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent State is directed to consider petitions from similarly situated teachers regarding representation preference?
BHARATKUMAR KANTIBHAI PRAJAPATI
STATE OF GUJARAT
A.G. URAIZEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
