Disposed

Babubhai Panabhai Parmar v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Gujarat HC20 Feb 2021SCA/16918/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a special civil application by directing respondent authorities to consider the petitioners' representation within three months, specifically instructing them not to be influenced by the order as no opinion was expressed on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondent authorities to consider petitioners' representation expeditiously within three months without being influenced by the order.

Babubhai Panabhai Parmar Vs Secretary, Gujarat… — Service and Employment | Gujarat HC (2021)

¶1

C/SCA/16918/2020 ORDER

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16918 of 2020

¶4

======================================================= BABUBHAI PANABHAI PARMAR

¶5

Versus

¶6

SECRETARY, GUJARAT REVENUE DEPARTMENT

¶7

======================================================= Appearance:

¶8

MR TEJAS SATTA FOR MR POPATJI H SOLANKI(5213) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3

¶9

for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6

¶10

MS JYOTI BHATT AGP (99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

¶11

=======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

¶13

Date : 20/02/2021

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

Heard Mr. Tejas Satta, learned advocate for Mr. Popatji Solanki, learned advocate for the petitioners and Ms. Jyoti Bhatt, learned AGP for the respondents.

¶16

Mr.Tejas Satta, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that without expressing any opinion on merits, present petition may be disposed of by directing the concerned respondent authorities to consider the representation preferred by the petitioners expeditiously within stipulated time frame, as per prevailing policy of the State Government.

¶17

In view of the above, present petition is disposed of by

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

C/SCA/16918/2020 ORDER

¶20

directing the concerned respondent authorities to consider the representation preferred by the petitioners expeditiously and preferably within period of three months from the date of receipt of present order in accordance with law and as per prevailing policy of the State Government and while considering the representation preferred by the petitioners the concerned respondent authorities shall also consider the aspect of delay.

¶21

With the aforesaid direction, present petition stands disposed of.

¶22

It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and the concerned respondent authorities shall decide the representation preferred by the petitioners without being influenced by this order.

¶23

Direct service through e-mail is permitted.

¶24

(A.G.URAIZEE, J)

¶25

SURESH SOLANKI

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Babubhai Panabhai Parmar v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babubhai Panabhai Parmar v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagubhai Galabhai Damor Vs State of Gujarat

Nilofarben W/O Raiskhan Pathan Vs State of Gujarat

Gujarat Forest Produce Gathers and Forest Workers Union through President Pravinbhai Ratibhai Vyas Vs State of Gujarat

Bhikhabhai Aminkhan Sipai (Pathan) Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Mafatsing Navaji Thakor Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Umarbhai Annubhai Sipai Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department