Dismissed

Mafatsing Navaji Thakor v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Gujarat HC20 Feb 2021SCA/16915/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a civil application without expressing opinions on merits. It directed respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's representation expeditiously within three months, considering delay aspects, per prevailing state policy.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent authorities to consider petitioner's representation expeditiously within three months considering delay.

Mafatsing Navaji Thakor Vs Secretary… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Gujarat HC (2021)

¶1

C/SCA/16915/2020 ORDER

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16915 of 2020

¶4

=======================================================

¶5

MAFATSING NAVAJI THAKOR

¶6

Versus

¶7

SECRETARY, GUJARAT REVENUE DEPARTMENT

¶8

======================================================= Appearance:

¶9

MR TEJAS SATTA FOR MR POPATJI H SOLANKI(5213) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

¶10

for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6

¶11

MS JYOTI BHATT AGP (99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

¶12

=======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

¶14

Date : 20/02/2021

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

Heard Mr. Tejas Satta, learned advocate for Mr. Popatji

¶17

Solanki, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Jyoti Bhatt, learned AGP for the respondents.

¶18

Mr.Tejas Satta, learned advocate for the petitioner

¶19

submits that without expressing any opinion on merits, present petition may be disposed of by directing the concerned respondent authorities to consider the representation preferred by the petitioner expeditiously within stipulated time frame, as per prevailing policy of the State Government.

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

C/SCA/16915/2020 ORDER

¶22

In view of the above, present petition is disposed of by directing the concerned respondent authorities to consider the representation preferred by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within period of three months from the date of receipt of present order in accordance with law and as per prevailing policy of the State Government and while considering the representation preferred by the petitioner the concerned respondent authorities shall also consider the aspect of delay.

¶23

With the aforesaid direction, present petition stands disposed of.

¶24

It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and the concerned respondent authorities shall decide the representation preferred by the petitioner without being influenced by this order.

¶25

Direct service through e-mail is permitted.

¶26

(A.G.URAIZEE, J)

¶27

SURESH SOLANKI

¶28

Page 2 of 2

Mafatsing Navaji Thakor v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mafatsing Navaji Thakor v. Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagubhai Galabhai Damor Vs State of Gujarat

Nilofarben W/O Raiskhan Pathan Vs State of Gujarat

Gujarat Forest Produce Gathers and Forest Workers Union through President Pravinbhai Ratibhai Vyas Vs State of Gujarat

Bhikhabhai Aminkhan Sipai (Pathan) Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Umarbhai Annubhai Sipai Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department

Babubhai Panabhai Parmar Vs Secretary, Gujarat Revenue Department