The applicant sought withdrawal of the pending criminal miscellaneous application as the charge was already framed in the main case. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the application without examining its merits.
Permission sought for withdrawal of the application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/17761/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17761 of 2020
===========================================================
LALITBHAI @ LALABHAI DUNGARBHAI GEDIYA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
===============================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR J K SHAH APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
===============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI Date : 29/01/2021 ORAL ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing,
after arguing for some time, learned advocate
Mr. Rathin Raval for the applicant has candidly
stated before the Court that the charge has already
been framed in the main case and as such, under the
instructions, he seeks permission to withdraw this
application.
2.Permission is granted. The application
stands disposed of as withdrawn.
3.It is needless to say that the Court has
not examined any merit in view of aforesaid
situation.
4.It would be open for the applicant to make
an appropriate request before the court concerned for
expeditious disposal of the trial.
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
cmk
Page 1 of 1
LALITBHAI @ LALABHAI DUNGARBHAI GEDIYA
STATE OF GUJARAT
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court