Therefore, grant of NA permission ought to have been considered by the authority. It has been submitted that despite all the circumstances, the first order passed by the Deputy Collector is absolutely non-speaking order and reflects non-application of mind. Unfortunately, the subsequent orders are mere mechanical exercise of powers by superior authority. That circumstance ought to have been considered by the learned Single Judge. Learned counsel while contending this has referred to the decision delivered by the original authority that has specifically contended that though there was a positive opinion to grant NA permission, such attention has not been paid to. Even from the relevant papers, it has been submitted before us that this entire area has been declared as a residential zone. This is reflected from page-61 of appeal compilation, wherein on 24.9.2012, the Town Planning Officer has categorically submitted that this block survey No.1348 is within the residential zone. Apart from that, there is no embargo with regard to the Sections 43 or 63 of the Tenancy Act in any nature coming that may hamper the process of grant of NA permission. On the contrary, from the proceedings, it appears that throughout there was, on the contrary, not only a positive opinion but also no objection is reflected from the record. For
