The petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the Supreme Court had issued notice in a connected matter raising similar issues. The acceptance of withdrawal is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/WPPIL/163/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 163 of 2019
=========================================================
HIMANSHU DILIPBHAI PANDYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================= Appearance: MS. KETKI P JHA(9864) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR AD OZA(515) for the Opponent(s) No. 2,4 MR MITUL K SHELAT(2419) for the Opponent(s) No. 3 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
=========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 14/02/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)
Shri I. H. Syed, learned Senior Counsel upon instructions from Ms. Ketki P. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 163 of 2019, states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy at appropriate stage. The reason for withdrawal is that the Supreme Court has issued notices in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1525 of 2019, raising similar issue. Notice is discharged.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
/phalguni/
Page 1 of 1
HIMANSHU DILIPBHAI PANDYA
VIKRAM NATH
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
