An oral order disposing of a contempt application because the direction of the Court had been complied with, resulting in the discharge of notice.
Contempt application disposed; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/707/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 707 of 2019
In
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14060 of 2008
=========================================================
UDAYKUMAR VINUBHAI SHAH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MR. S.B. VASAVA ========================================================= Appearance:
MS. SHIVANGI M RANA(7053) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 PAULOMEE M MEHTA(8313) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2 MR PREMAL R JOSHI(1327) for the Opponent(s) No. 3
=========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 14/02/2020
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)
Ms. Paulomee Mehta, learned advocate for Ms. Shivangi Rana, learned counsel for the applicant states that the direction of this Court has since been complied with, as such, this contempt does not require any further consideration. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. Notice is discharged.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
/phalgun/
Page 1 of 1
Udaykumar Vinubhai Shah
State of Gujarat
Vikram Nath
Ashutosh J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
