The Gujarat High Court disposed of criminal miscellaneous application R/CR.MA/10027/2020 as infructuous since the corresponding regular bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No.10642/2020) was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/10027/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 10027 of 2020
========================================================== MUKESH @ NANNI ARJUNBHAI KALIDAS BHIL
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance: THROUGH JAIL(50) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR RC KODEKAR, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA
Date : 05/08/2020
ORAL ORDER
Since the regular bail application being Criminal Misc. Application No.10642 of 2020 is allowed, this application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
(R.P.DHOLARIA, J)
TAUSIF SAIYED
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of as having become infructuous following the allowance of regular bail application?
If the regular bail application in Criminal Misc. Application No.10642 of 2020 is allowed, how does it impact the present bail application?
Mukesh @ Nanni Arjunbhai Kalidas Bhil
State of Gujarat
R.P.Dholaria
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
