Disposed

Atul Tarashankar Dube v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC13 Apr 2018SCA/1533/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Ahmedabad disposed of a Special Civil Application regarding pre-detention under PASA. The court clarified that while detention was barred for specific offences without further details, the petition failed on merits due to disclosure of no restraining proposal.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the petition; restrained from detaining petitioner without additional info regarding specific FIR.

Atul Tarashankar Dube Vs State of Gujarat — Bail and Remand | Gujarat HC (2018)

¶1

C/SCA/1533/2018 ORDER

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1533 of 2018

¶4

==========================================================

¶5

ATUL TARASHANKAR DUBE

¶6

Versus

¶7

STATE OF GUJARAT

¶8

==========================================================

¶9

Appearance:

¶10

J M TALOTA(7443) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 MR AMIT BAROT, AGP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED BY DS(65) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3

¶11

==========================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. SHAH Date : 13/04/2018

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

1.Learned AGP is in receipt of communication by
PI, Amraiwadi police station, Ahmedabad, copy of
which is to be taken on record, disclosing that
there is no proposal to detain the petitioner.

¶15

2.It is clarified that herein after, the
detaining authority shall not detain the
petitioner under the PASA Act on account of
offence/s registered vide FIR being C.R. No.I-10
of 2018 with Amraiwadi police station.

¶16

3.However, it is also made clear that now
considering the fact that there is offence/s
registered against the petitioner, respondents
are restrained from detaining the petitioner of

¶17

same FIR/s, unless they have any additional
information or any further details, which are

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

C/SCA/1533/2018 ORDER

¶20

available to them hereinafter only.

¶21

4.In view of such disclosure, the present
petition at pre-detention stage does not survive
and hence, it is disposed of accordingly. Rule is
answered accordingly. Direct service is
permitted.

¶22

(S.G. SHAH, J.)

¶23

binoy

¶24

Page 2 of 2

Atul Tarashankar Dube v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atul Tarashankar Dube v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit @ Bholo S/O. Ramsnehi @ Ramchandra Yadav Vs State of Gujarat

Nikesh @ Raja Ganpatsinh Gohil Vs State of Gujarat

Sarfaraz @ Sarfu Lamboo Akhtar Husain Shaikh Vs State of Gujarat

Mohsin @ Sade Nav S/O. Maksurkhan Pathan Vs State of Gujarat

Sanjaybhai Somabhai Vasava Vs State of Gujarat

Ghelabhai Masabhai Bharwad Vs State of Gujarat