Dismissed

Mohsin @ Sade Nav S/O. Maksurkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC13 Apr 2018SCA/1521/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Thin oral order where the court, on receipt of a police disclosure that there is no proposal to detain the petitioner and existing FIRs, discharged the detaining authority and disposed of the petition at the pre-detention stage.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; detaining authority restrained from detaining petitioner under same FIRs without additional info; direct service permitted.

Mohsin @ Sade Nav S/O. Maksurkhan Pathan Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Gujarat HC (2018)

¶1

C/SCA/1521/2018 ORDER

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1521 of 2018

¶4

==========================================================

¶5

MOHSIN @ SADE NAV S/O. MAKSURKHAN PATHAN

¶6

Versus

¶7

STATE OF GUJARAT

¶8

==========================================================

¶9

Appearance:

¶10

RUSHI B BHAVSAR(9342) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR AMIT BAROT, AGP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED BY DS(65) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3

¶11

==========================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. SHAH Date : 13/04/2018

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

1.Learned AGP is in receipt of communication by
PI, Vejalpur police station, Ahmedabad, copy of
which is to be taken on record, disclosing that
there is no proposal to detain the petitioner.

¶15

2.It is clarified that herein after, the
detaining authority shall not detain the
petitioner under the PASA Act on account of
offence/s registered vide FIRs being C.R. Nos.67
of 2015 and 210 of 2017 with Vejalpur police
station.

¶16

3.However, it is also made clear that now
considering the fact that there is offence/s
registered against the petitioner, respondents
are restrained from detaining the petitioner of
same FIR/s, unless they have any additional

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

C/SCA/1521/2018 ORDER

¶19

information or any further details, which are
available to them hereinafter only.

¶20

4.In view of such disclosure, the present
petition at pre-detention stage does not survive
and hence, it is disposed of accordingly. Rule is
answered accordingly. Direct service is
permitted.

¶21

binoy

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Mohsin @ Sade Nav S/O. Maksurkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohsin @ Sade Nav S/O. Maksurkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit @ Bholo S/O. Ramsnehi @ Ramchandra Yadav Vs State of Gujarat

Nikesh @ Raja Ganpatsinh Gohil Vs State of Gujarat

Sarfaraz @ Sarfu Lamboo Akhtar Husain Shaikh Vs State of Gujarat

Sanjaybhai Somabhai Vasava Vs State of Gujarat

Atul Tarashankar Dube Vs State of Gujarat

Ghelabhai Masabhai Bharwad Vs State of Gujarat