Hearing an RLP and CA, the Gujarat High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal and disposed of both matters without reaching the merits.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; Appeal and Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/LPA/292/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 292 of 2018
With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2018
==========================================================
NITABEN JITENDRAKUMAR MUNJANI
Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
==========================================================
Appearance:
MITTAL N PATEL(7614) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR NIMESH M PATEL(6780) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 VIKAS V NAIR(7444) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 23/11/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE)
Upon instructions received from the appellant, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. Permission as prayed for is granted. Appeal stands disposed of as having been withdrawn. It is clarified that we have not entered into the merits of the matter. Civil Application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(ANANT S. DAVE, ACJ)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
DIVYA
Page 1 of 1
NitabenJitendarKumar Munjani
Punjab National Bank
Anant S. Dave
Biren VaishNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
