The High Court of Gujarat granted permission to the appellant, Taluka Development Officer, to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. Consequently, the appeal and the stay application were dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal was granted; appeal and stay application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/LPA/1408/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1408 of 2018 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18715 of 2011 With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2018
========================================================== TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Versus
VIKARAM KHODABHAI CHAUHAN
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the APPEALLANT ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVT. PLEADER/PP(99) for RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 23/11/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE)
Mr.H.S.Munshaw, learned advocate for the appellant – Taluka Development Officer, seeks permission to withdraw this Letters Patent Appeal since, according to him, the Taluka Panchayat is not the competent authority.
Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, Civil Application for stay also stands dismissed.
(ANANT S. DAVE, ACJ)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
sunil
Page 1 of 1
TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
VIKARAM KHODABHAI CHAUHAN
ANANT S. DAVE
BIREN VAISHNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
