Contempt petition challenging dismissal of a withdrawn writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Court found no adjudication surviving as the underlying writ petition was withdrawn.
Contempt petition stands closed as the underlying writ petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010301072019
2026:GAU-AS:13493
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/729/2019
RINKU GOGAI
S/O- SORAT GOGAI, VILL AND P.O. LAKHIPATHAR, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
PRATAP SINGHA
THE COMMANDANT, 21ST A.P.(IR)BN, KATLICHERRA, DIST.HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, 788001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F Z MAZUMDER, MR S GAUTAM,MR B M DEKA,MR. K M MAHANTA,MR K K MAHANTA,MR. J LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR H SARMA, ADDL. SR. GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
14.09.2026
Page No.# 2/2
“Heard Mr. F. Z. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Issue notice, returnable within 3 (three) weeks.
Mr. D. Nath, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents.
Petitioner may be paid the subsistence allowance during the period of his suspension.
List the matter again on 06.08.2019.”
Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel appears for the all respondents.
Prayer is allowed.
The Writ Petition is dismissed on withdrawal as prayed for, with liberty to file afresh”.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rinku Gogai
Pratap Singha
The Commandant, 21st A.P.(IR)BN
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
