Dismissed¶22

Karim Ali v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC8 Jun 2026Bail Appln./1313/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court; Bail Appln./1313/2026; Karim Ali v. State of Assam; bail rejected; Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023; Sections 64(1) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023; Boko Police Station Case No. 106/2026; FIR dated 04.05.2026; prima facie materials; case diary perused; Anjan Moni Kalita, J.; order dated 09-06-2026.

What did the court decide?

After perusal of the Case Diary, the Court found sufficient prima facie materials against the accused-applicant and was not inclined to grant any relief at that stage. ¶21

Karim Ali Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010097892026

2026:GAU-AS:8066

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./1313/2026

¶6

KARIM ALI

¶7

S/O. MAMIN ALI,R/O. NO. 2 JAMBARI, P.O. JAMBARI,P.S. BOK,DISTKAMRUP, ASSAM.MOB. 60013 98403.PIN- 781141.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THELEARNED P.P., ASSAM

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AHMED, MS P KAKATI

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶12

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Date : 09-06-2026

¶15

Heard Mr. A.K. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the accusedapplicant. Also heard B. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

¶17

Page No.# 2/2

¶18

Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Boko Police Station Case No. 106/2026 registered under Sections 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant is nowhere connected to the offence that has been alleged in the FIR dated 04.05.2026 wherein the allegation has been made that the informant was wrongfully touched by the accused-applicant in the pretext of putting some ointment as she was having a problem of pimples. The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant is behind the bars for last 35 (Thirty Five) days and therefore, taking into account the long detention, the accused-applicant should be granted bail.

¶20

Case Diary in the instant case has been produced before this Court and the same is perused by this Court.

¶21

After perusal of the Case Diary and having found sufficient prima facie materials against the accused-applicant, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the accused-applicant at this stage.

¶22

Accordingly, the instant Bail Application stands rejected.

¶23

Comparing Assistant

Karim Ali v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karim Ali v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atabur Rahman Alias Rohman Vs State of Assam

Pakhila Das and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Ananda Dev Choudhury Alias Ananda Deb Chpoudhury Vs the State of Assam

Mijanur Rahman and 4 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Nur Mahammad Alies Nuru Mia Vs the State of Assam

Rajendra Choudhury @ Rajen Choudhury Vs Hitesh Deka and Anr.