Dismissed¶¶24

Atabur Rahman Alias Rohman v. State of Assam

Gauhati HC7 Jun 2026AB/1071/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pre-arrest bail; anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNS 2023; Section 108 BNS 2023; abetment of suicide; harassment of minor girl; suicide by hanging; Lumding P.S. Case No. 25/2026; FIR dated 24.02.2026; case diary perused; prima facie incriminating materials; application rejected/dismissed; Gauhati High Court; Anjan Moni Kalita, J.; AB/1071/2026; dated 08.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the case diary, the Court formed the considered opinion that there are prima facie sufficient incriminating materials against the accused/applicant of his involvement in the offence narrated in the FIR. ¶¶21

Atabur Rahman Alias Rohman Vs State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010097812026

2026:GAU-AS:8004

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/1071/2026

¶6

ATABUR RAHMAN ALIAS ROHMAN S/O ABDUL MALEK VILL NO. 2 KHAGORIJAN PS LUMDING DIST HOJAI ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HALDAR, MS S. BASAK

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶11

-BEFORE-

¶12

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER

¶13

08.06.2026

¶14

Heard Mr. B. Haldar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned APP for the state respondents.

¶15

This is an application under Section 482 of BNS 2023, praying

¶16

Page No.# 2/3

¶17

for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Lumding P.S. Case No.25/2026 under Section 108 of BNS 2023.

¶18

An FIR was lodged on 24.02.2026 by the informant, alleging that his daughter aged about 16 years was mentally tortured by the accused/applicant for the last 2 years with proposals of love; due to such harassment, his daughter had to absent herself from taking examination one year ago that the accused/applicant went outside the state for some time, then again he came back and started harassing his daughter again; Due to such harassment, the minor daughter of the informant had committed suicide by hanging herself.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant submits that in fact the informant's daughter and the accused/ applicant was in a love relationship and he has not done anything which could have led to the commission of suicide by the victim girl. He submits that there is no incidence of any abetment from his side and therefore, the accused/applicant should be granted pre-arrest bail at this stage.

¶20

The case diary in the instant case has been produced before this Court and the same is perused.

¶21

On perusal of the case diary, this Court is of the considered opinion that there are prima facie sufficient incriminating materials against the accused/applicant of his involvement in the offence so narrated in the FIR.

¶22

Accordingly, the instant anticipatory application stands rejected.

¶23

Page No.# 3/3

¶24

8. The instant anticipatory application stands dismissed.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Atabur Rahman Alias Rohman v. State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atabur Rahman Alias Rohman v. State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Sahil Khan Vs the State of Assam

Sri Moon Saharia Alias Manjit Saharia and Anr. Vs State of Assam

Bharat Sunar Vs the State of Assam

Raj Ali Vs the State of Assam

Lakhya Das Alias Lakhya Dhar Das Vs the State of Assam

Pakhila Das and Anr. Vs the State of Assam