Allowed

Rinku Das v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC9 Nov 2025AB/2158/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused-applicant sought pre-arrest bail under Section 482 BNSS in Dispur P.S. Case No. 730/2025 under Sections 318(4)/316(2) BNS. Having appeared before the IO, cooperated, and with charge-sheet filed, the Court made absolute the earlier interim pre-arrest bail order.

What did the court decide?

Interim pre-arrest bail made absolute in same terms and conditions; applicant to appear before Trial Court as and when noticed.

Rinku Das Vs the State of Assam — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010199202025

2025:GAU-AS:15155

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/2158/2025

¶6

RINKU DAS S/O BHADRESWAR DAS R/O PARLY PALASHBARI P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781128.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, N. CHOUDHURY,MR A. ALI,A. K. KANU Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶10

BEFORE

¶11

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 10.11.2025

¶14

Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State respondent.

¶15

Page No.# 2/2

¶16

2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 730/2025, registered under Sections 318(4)/316(2) of the BNS, 2023.

¶17

3. Vide an order dated 05.09.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, interim pre-arrest bail was granted to the accused-applicant. The learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the accusedapplicant has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and has his statement recorded. The learned counsel further submits that as per the instructions, the police have filed Charge-sheet in the matter.

¶18

4. Looking into the facts of the case and that the accused-applicant had already appeared before the Investigating Officer and he has been co-operating with the investigation, and since the Charge-sheet has already been filed before the Trial Court, this Court is of the considered view that the interim order so passed earlier should be made absolute.

¶19

5. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail order passed on 05.09.2025 is made absolute in the same terms and conditions. However, the accused-applicant shall appear before the Trial Court as and when he receives notice from the Trial Court.

¶20

6. In view of the above, the instant Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of as allowed.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

Comparing Assistant

Rinku Das v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku Das v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dildar Ali Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Gunaram Pegu Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Sahanur Sheikh Alias Sahanur Ali Vs the State of Assam

Smti Shyama Bora Vs the State of Assam

Jitu Das Vs the State of Assam

Abdul Malek Vs the State of Assam and Anr.