Allowed¶21

Smti Shyama Bora v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC9 Nov 2025AB/1936/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; pre-arrest bail made absolute; Nagaon P.S. Case No. 1157/2024; Sections 61(2)/318(4)/316(2) BNS 2023; interim order dated 13.08.2025; accused appeared before Investigating Officer; co-operation with investigation; charge-sheet filed; condition to appear before Trial Court on notice; Gauhati High Court; Anjan Moni Kalita, J.; AB/1936/2025; disposed of as allowed.

What did the court decide?

Interim pre-arrest bail order dated 13.08.2025 made absolute in the same terms and conditions, subject to the condition that the accused-applicant appear before the Trial Court on notice; Anticipatory Bail Application disposed of as allowed. ¶21

Smti Shyama Bora Vs the State of Assam — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010174542025

2025:GAU-AS:15154

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/1936/2025

¶6

SMTI SHYAMA BORA W/O KAJU BORA R/O TULASHI MUKH P.S. SADAR (NAGAR).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A SHARMA, MR I AHMED

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 10.11.2025

¶14

Heard Mr. A. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State respondent.

¶15

2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant

¶16

Page No.# 2/2

¶17

of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No. 1157/2024, registered under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/316(2) of the BNS, 2023.

¶18

3. Vide an order dated 13.08.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, interim pre-arrest bail was granted to the accused-applicant. The learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the accusedapplicant has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and has his statement recorded. The learned counsel further submits that as per the instructions, the police have filed Charge-sheet in the matter.

¶19

4. Looking into the facts of the case and that the accused-applicant had already appeared before the Investigating Officer and he has been co-operating with the investigation, and since the Charge-sheet has already been filed before the Trial Court, this Court is of the considered view that the interim order so passed earlier should be made absolute.

¶20

5. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail order passed on 13.08.2025 is made absolute in the same terms and conditions. However, the accused-applicant shall appear before the Trial Court as and when he receives notice from the Trial Court.

¶21

6. In view of the above, the instant Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of as allowed.

¶22

JUDGE

¶23

Comparing Assistant

Smti Shyama Bora v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smti Shyama Bora v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dildar Ali Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Gunaram Pegu Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Sahanur Sheikh Alias Sahanur Ali Vs the State of Assam

Rinku Das Vs the State of Assam

Jitu Das Vs the State of Assam

Abdul Malek Vs the State of Assam and Anr.