The Gauhati High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a tender/procedure as infructuous because the work had already been completed by the time the petition was heard.
Petition disposed as infructuous; no substantive relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015972023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/558/2023
M/s T.K and Sons Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : Address:through its Proprietor Shri Techi Kaha Village Lower Gai P.O and P.S Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 8131903192 VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Others Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by the Secretary Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Department Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY) Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Arunachal Rural Roads Development Agency (ARRDA) Rural Work Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Works Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Circle Yachuli.
Page No.# 2/2
4:The Executive Engineer/DPIU Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Works Department Lower Subansiri District Ziro Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Tender Evaluation Committee Age: 0 Occupation : Address:headed by its Chairman cum Superintending Engineer Rural Works Circle Yachuli. -----------Advocate for : Khoda Tari Advocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for The State of AP and 4 Others: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
Date : 09.09.2024.
Heard Mr. K. Tari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD.
The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter has become infructuous, as the work in question has already been completed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s T.K and Sons Enterprises
The State of AP
Secretary Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Department
Chief Engineer (PMGSY)
Superintending Engineer
Executive Engineer/DPIU
Karadak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
