The Gauhati High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the underlying work has already been completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015972023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/556/2023
M/s T.K and Sons Enterprises
through its Proprietor Shri Techi Kaha, Village Lower Gai, P.O and P.S Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 8131903192
VERSUS
The State of AP and 4 Others Represented by the Secretary Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Rural Work Department, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY) Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Rural Roads Development Agency (ARRDA) Rural Work Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Circle Yachuli.
4:The Executive Engineer and PIU Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Lower Subansiri District Ziro Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Tender Evaluation Committee Age: 0
Page No.# 2/2
Occupation : headed by its Chairman cum Superintending Engineer Rural Works Circle Yachuli. 6:M/s Mountain Green Age: 0 Occupation : Village Hija P.O and P.S Ziro District Lower Subansiri Arunachal Pradesh 79112
Advocate for the Petitioner : Khoda Tari,
Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, Kirmani Lollen,Riya Sarkar,Khoda Apa,Terji Kamchi,Taba Tokur,Gamken Bam,T T Tara,for caveator,Nending Kago,SC(RWD),for caveator,Nending Kago .
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
Date : 09.09.2024.
Heard Mr. K. Tari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD.
The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter has become infructuous, as the work in question has already been completed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s T.K and Sons Enterprises through its Proprietor Shri Techi Kaha
The State of AP
Government of Arunachal Pradesh
Secretary Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Department
Chief Engineer PMGSY Arunachal Rural Roads Development Agency
Superintending Engineer Rural Works Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
