Writ petition concerning a rural works tender; parties conceded the matter had become infructuous as the work was completed, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040015972023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/557/2023
M/s T. K and Sons Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : Address:through its Proprietor Shri Techi Kaha Village Lower Gai P.O and P.S Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 8131903192 VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Others Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by the Secretary Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Department Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY) Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Arunachal Rural Roads Development Agency (ARRDA) Rural Work Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Works Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh Rural Work Circle Yachuli.
Page No.# 2/3
4:The Executive Engineer /DPIU Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Works Department Lower Subansiri District Ziro Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Tender Evaluation Committee Age: 0 Occupation : Address:headed by its Chairman cum Superintending Engineer Rural Works Circle Yachuli. 6:M/s BM Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Village A-Sector Naharlagun P.O and P.S Naharlagun District Papum pare Arunachal pradesh 791110 -----------Advocate for : Khoda Tari Advocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for The State of AP and 5 Others: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
Date : 09.09.2024.
Heard Mr. K. Tari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD.
The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter has become infructuous, as the work in question has already been completed.
Page No.# 3/3
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s T. K and Sons Enterprises
The State of AP
The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)
The Superintending Engineer
The Executive Engineer /DPIU
M/s BM Enterprise
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
