Criminal petition seeking quashing of an FIR; counsel submitted the FIR had already been quashed, rendering the matter infructuous. The court closed and disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040012762024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn./154/2024
Ms Sunita Namchoom Daughter of Late Chow Mehou Namchoom, resident of Village Chongkham, PO and PS Chongkham, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 2 Ors represented by the PP of AP
2:Rajendra Kumar Lahoti Age: 0 Occupation : resident of LIC Building Jaipur Road 8-A-3 Jai Narayan Vyas Colony PO PS and District Bikaner Rajasthan 334001
3:Anand Lahoti Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Shri Rajendra Kumar Lahoti resident of LIC Building Jaipur Road 8-A-3 Jai Narayan Vyas Colony PO PS and District Bikaner Rajasthan 33400
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : Gamken Bam, D Varma
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 11-11-2024
Heard Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
It is submitted that the FIR into the case has already been quashed. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this criminal petition stands closed and disposed of on being infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ms Sunita Namchoom
The State of AP represented by the PP of AP
Rajendra Kumar Lahoti
Anand Lahoti
Budi Habung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
