7. It is submitted that after settling the matter mutually amongst the parties, they were living their life happily and peacefully; however, as soon as they came to know about the filing of the chargesheet and issuance of summon to the accused petitioner no. 4, the petitioners over and again had come together and reduced their earlier mutual settlement into agreement by executing a “Deed of Compromise” on 11.11.2024, whereby it is stated that the parties have mutually settled the matter amongst themselves and that the informant/petitioner no. 1 and the victim/petitioner no. 2 while acknowledging the help and support extended to the victim by the accused petitioner no. 4 for their medical bills and expenses, have expressed that since the matter has already been settled some 6 years back and as they do not have any further grievance against the petitioner nos. 3 and 4, they do not want to pursue the aforementioned case against the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 any further. However, as the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Yupia does not have the power to compromise the non-compoundable offence especially section 279 IPC, the petitioners approached this Court with the prayer for setting aside and quashing of the proceeding of GR case no. 111/2017 arising out of Itanagar PS case no. 38/2017 under section 279/338 of IPC pending before the learned Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Yupia.
