The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application for non-prosecution, finding the petitioner had lost interest as he was absent on two prior calls without appearance.
The bail application stands dismissed for non-prosecution; case diary shall be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005952024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./93/2024
KUNAL BAHADUR @ KUNAL MARAK SO LATE UMESH MARAK PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL- JORABAT P.S. KHANAPARA, P.O. BYRNIHAT DIST. RI-BHOI, MEGHALAYA.
VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS A KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
O R D E R
15.02.2024
None appears for the petitioner on call today.
Page No.# 2/2
Heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
Case record reveals that on 05.02.2024 and 12.02.2024, the petitioner were absent on call.
Today, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has lost interest in this bail application.
Therefore, the bail application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. The case diary shall be returned.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Kunal Bahadur @ Kunal Marak
State of Assam Rep. by the PP, Assam
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
