This order dismisses a contempt petition because the petitioned WP(C) No.3863/2017 was dismissed as infructuous, thus closing the present application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010028682017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/353/2017
BHANJOO TANTI S/O LATE GOBORDHAN TANTI ADDRESS-BEHORA T.E. PO-NUMALIGARH AND P.S.-BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785615
VERSUS
P.K.BURAGOHAIN and 5 ORS. THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT and RURAL DEVELOPMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
2:MR. GOURAV BOTHRA THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 3:MR. SUBRATA ROY BARDHAN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICE OF THE GOLAGHAT ZILA PARISHAD PO and PS-GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 4:MS. LOLITA NATH THE CHAIRMAN GOLAGHAT WEST ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT PO-BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
PIN-785612 5:MR. ABHINASH SAIKIA
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SECRETARY GOLAGHAT WEST ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT PO-BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785612 6:SRI DIGANTA SAIKIA S/O LATE SUREN SAIKIA R/O KHATIYAKHALI NEPALIKHUTI PO-ROJABARI PS-BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 -----------Advocate for : MR.S S S RAHMAN Advocate for : appearing for P.K.BURAGOHAIN and 5 ORS.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
20.02.2024
No one appears for the petitioner on call.
This Contempt Petition had been filed on the ground that the order dated 22.06.2017 passed in WP(C) No.3863/2017 has not been complied with.
As WP(C) No.3863/2017 has been dismissed on being infructuous, the present Contempt Petition also stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bhanjuo Tanti
P.K. Buragohain
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
