The Court closed a contempt application as misconceived because the alleged violation occurred after the status-quo order in the underlying writ petition had expired and was not extended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010015152015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/318/2015
JAGADISH PRASAD GUPTA @ JAGADISH GUPTA S/O- LT. LALCHAND, R/O- 3/C, ISPAT COMPLEX, N S ROAD, FATASIL, GHY9, ASSAM.
VERSUS
NIRMAL KUMAR SHARMA and ANR R/O- C/O- PRATIKSHA HOSPITAL, BORBARI, SIX MILE, GHY- 36.
2:MRINAL DAS THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE GORCHUK POLICE STATION GORCHUK GUWAHATI
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. S. P. Roy Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Mr. S. Baruah, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
O R D E R
09.01.2024
The instant Contempt Application has been filed alleging willful violation to the order dated 02.03.2015 passed in WP(C) No.848/2015 by
Page No.# 2/2
this Court.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged violation occurred while a valid status-quo order was in force?
Jagadish Prasad Gupta @ Jagadish Gupta
Nirmal Kumar Sharma
Mrinal Das The Officer-In-Charge Gorchuk Police Station Gorchuk Guwahati
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
