The petitioner sought closure of a contempt petition on the ground that the respondents had complied with the previous court order. The court accepted this submission.
Contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010061862021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/193/2021
NRIPENDRA SARMAH
S/O LATE NAGENDRA NATH SARMAH, R/O WARD NO. 1, GOLMAGAON, PIN-784509 IN THE DISTRICT OF UDALGURI, ASSAM
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA AND 7 ORS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:SHYAM JAGANNATHAN ACS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
3:MONORANJAN DUTTA IAS SECRETARY PENSION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
4:R S BORGOYARI DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTC KOKRAJHAR PO AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
5:PRITHWISH KUMAR CHKI
Page No.# 2/2
DIRECTOR OF PENSION HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR 6:ABDUL RAUF ACCOUNTANT GENERAL MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 7:BHABEN DEWRY THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS UDALGURI DISTRICT CIRCLE PO AND DIST. UDALGURI ASSAM
8:MANDEEP DAS AFS THE TREASURY OFFICER UDALGURI PO AND DIST. UDALGURI ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M P SARMA, MS. N SHYAMAL,MR. A BORO
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 08.11.2024
Mr. M.P. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nripendra Sarma
Preetom Saikia
Commissioner and Secretary, Education (Secondary) Department
Shyam Jagannathan ACS
Monoranjan Dutta IAS
R S Borgoyari
Lanusungkum Jamir
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
