Contempt petition arising out of WP(C) No. 37 of 2021 became infructuous after the Division Bench allowed the appeal in WA No. 40/2021 and the Supreme Court dismissed the related special leave petition. The court closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030002632021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/10/2021
Lalronghaki and 976 Ors Dam Veng, Aizawl Mizoram
VERSUS
Lalnunmawia Chuaungo and 3 Ors Aizawl, Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte (Addl.AG/GA, Mizoram) for R1-R4
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER
07.11.2024
Heard Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that the instant contempt petition is arising out of WP(C) No. 37 of 2021 which was appealed against by the respondents in the Division Bench registered as WA No. 40/2021. The Division Bench vide its order dated 11.12.2023 had allowed the appeal, against which, the instant petitioners had approached the Hon’be Apex Court, which was again dismissed vide the Order dated 30.08.2024 in Special Leave Petition(Civil) Diary No(s). 11172/2024.
Page No.# 2/2
The learned counsel submits that for the aforesaid reasons, the instant contempt petition has become infructuous.
Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court finding that the instant contempt petition has become infructuous accordingly the Cont.Cas(C) No. 10/2021 is closed and thus stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Annette
Lalronghaki and 976 Ors
Lalnunmawia Chuaungo and 3 Ors
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
