authorities vide a letter dated 22.07.2022 seeking conciliation of the disputes and its claims in terms of Clause 26.1.1 r/w Clause 26.2 of the ContractAgreement dated 09.02.2016. Citing failure on the part of the respondent authorities to conciliate the disputes and claims, the petitioner-applicant subsequently invoked arbitration in terms of Clause 26.3 of the ContractAgreement dated 09.02.2016 vide its notice dated 30.07.2022 issued in terms of Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applicant-petitioner stated to have notified its claims in excess of Rs. 124 Crores against the respondent NHIDCL authorities which have arisen as a consequence of the wrongful termination of the Contract-Agreement dated 09.02.2016. Stating that the respondent NHIDCL authorities had allegedly refused to agree for appointment of an Arbitrator by way of its reply dated 31.08.2022, on the ground that seeking of appointment of an Arbitrator was on misconceived ground, the petitioner-applicant had preferred an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court being Arb. Petition no. 1073/2022 and the same is pending as on date. It is further averred that owing to refusal by the respondent NHIDCL to certify the value of the unpaid works of the petitioner-applicant and the imminent appointment of a 3rd party contractor in respect of the subject-work, the applicant-petitioner has also filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court and the same has been registered and numbered as OMP [I][Comm] no. 384/2022 seeking certification of the value of the unpaid remaining works. The said application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is also pending as on date. When the Arb. Petition no. 1073/2022 came up for consideration before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on 19.01.2023, the Hon’ble
