The Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Bench dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it has become infructuous. Earlier interim orders, if any, were vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005922023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/216/2023
Bodro Khanta Taid S/o Lt. Patir Taid,
Serving as Casual Electrician at Office of the Executive Engineer (E), Yazali Electrical Division, Department of Power, PO/PS Yazali, Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 9366452779
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented by the Superintending Engineer, Department of Power, Yazali, Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The Executive Engineer (E) Yazali Electrical Division Department of Power Yazali Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Assistant Engineer (AE) Electrical Sub Division Department of Power Yazali Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi
Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 09-08-2023
Ms. T. Rimi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed on having become infructuous.
Interim order passed earlier, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bodro Khanta Taid
The State of AP and Others
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
