Dismissed

All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association (Aarca) v. the State of Ap and 8 Ors.

Gauhati HC7 Aug 2023WP(C)/349/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association challenging an Invitation For Bids. The court held the petitioner lacked locus standi as it was not an eligible contractor enlisted as per the IFB terms and vacated a status-quo order.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed for want of locus standi; status-quo order vacated.

All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association… — Service and Employment | Gauhati HC (2023)

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC040010112023

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

Case No. : WP(C)/349/2023

¶5

All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association (AARCA) Represented by its President, Shri Deepak Charu, S/o Late Charu Taw, R/o 2 Kilo, Papu Nallah, PO/PS Papu Nallah, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. Mob. No. 9436881111

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

1.The State of Arunachal Pradesh represented by the Principal Secretary, (Public Work Department), Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.

¶8

2:the Chief Engineer, (APPWD), Central Zone)-B, Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

¶9

3:The Executive Engineer, (APPWD), Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

¶10

4:M/s Badri Rai & Company, represented by its partner Shri Arun Kumar Rai, having its office near Radha Krishna Mandir, Station Road, Duliajan, Dibrugarh, Assam-786602.

¶11

5:TRIBENI CONSTRUCTION LIMITED, Guwahati, C/o Mr. Oni Dai, Pasighat, PO/PS-Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh

¶12

6:Shri Tani Taki,

¶13

Executive Engineer, (PWD), Pasighat Division, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and Chairman of Screening Committee on Opening of Tender Bid

¶14

7:Shri Sobo Sitang, Assistant Surveyor of Works, PWD, Pasighat Division, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh,

¶15

Page No.# 2/4

¶16

(Member, Screening Committee for Opening of Tender Bid)

¶17

8:Shri Mano Tayeng, Assistant Engineer (PWD), Sub-Division, Bilat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

¶18

(Member, Screening Committee for Opening of Tender Bid)

¶19

9: Shri Ronel Panggam, Divisional Accountant (i/c) PWD, Pasighat Division, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. (Member, Screening Committee for Opening of Tender Bid)

¶20

Advocate for the Petitioner : Nalo Pada,

¶21

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Mr. R. B. Phookan

¶22

BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Date : 07-08-2023

¶25

Heard Mr. N. Pada, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents no. 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. R. B. Phookan, who has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 4 by filing a Caveat.

¶26

This writ petition has been filed, challenging Invitation For Bids (IFB), dated 22.06.2023, issued by the Executive Engineer, Pasighat Division, PWD, Arunachal Pradesh, vide No. PA/Con-1/2023-24/1131-37, whereby, online tender (Turnkey mode) in Two Bid System (Technical & Financial) from eligible APST & Non-APST contractors enlisted in APPWD and equivalent class/category of contractors

¶27

Page No.# 3/4

¶28

registered with other enlistment authority has been invited for work “Upgradation of Bakin Pertin General Hospital Pasighat to 300 Bedded Hospital in East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh” at an estimated cost of Rs. 99.03 Crore (Rupees Ninety-Nine Crore & Three Lakh).

¶29

The petitioner is stated to be All Arunachal Registered Contractor’s Association, registered vide Regd. No. SR/ITA/4231, with its Headquarter at Papu Nallah, Naharlagun under Papumpare District of Arunachal Pradesh and is represented by its president.

¶30

Since the online tender, as mentioned above, has been invited from the eligible APST & Non-APST contractors enlisted in APPWD and equivalent class/category of contractors registered with other enlistment authority, in the absence of the petitioner describing itself as eligible contractor enlisted in in APPWD and equivalent class/category of contractors registered with other enlistment authority, as mentioned in the Invitation For Bids (IFB), dated 22.06.2023, I am of the view that the petitioner of the instant writ petition is not an eligible contractor, in terms of the Invitation For Bids (IFB), dated 22.06.2023, issued by the Executive Engineer, Pasighat Division, PWD, Arunachal Pradesh, Pasighat, vide No. PA/Con1/2023-24/1131-37.

¶31

In that view of the matter, the petitioner lacks locus standi to challenge the Invitation For Bids (IFB), dated 22.06.2023, issued by the Executive Engineer, Pasighat Division, PWD, Arunachal Pradesh, Pasighat, vide No. PA/Con-1/202324/1131-37.

¶32

The writ petition stands disposed of, for want of locus standi of the

¶33

Page No.# 4/4

¶34

petitioner to challenge the Invitation For Bids (IFB), dated 22.06.2023, issued by the Executive Engineer, Pasighat Division, PWD, Arunachal Pradesh, Pasighat, vide No. PA/Con-1/2023-24/1131-37.

¶35

The status-quo order passed on 31.07.2023, accordingly stands vacated.

¶36

JUDGE

¶37

Comparing Assistant

All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association (Aarca) v. the State of Ap and 8 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

All Arunachal Registered Contractors Association (Aarca) v. the State of Ap and 8 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Tatu Ruyi Vs the State of A.P. and 3 Ors.

Tasang Taga Vs the State of Ap and 2 Ors.

Shri Dosh Dasi Vs the State of A.P. and 4 Ors.

Kenli Doji Vs The Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

M/s Khenewa Group Vs the State of Ap and 3 Ors.

Joram Alla @ Sala Vs the State of Ap and 2 Ors.