The Gauhati High Court dismissed a revision petition filed by Pranjal Phukan against Parashar Nath, finding no merit in the allegations.
Revision petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010105502023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./200/2023
PRANJAL PHUKAN S/O LATE BISHNU PHUKAN PERMANENT RESIDENT OF C/O SRI KAPIL PHUKAN HOUSE NO. 46, GANSH NAGAR, JYOTI NAGAR, BAMUNIMAIDAN, P.S. CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-781021, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
PARASHAR NATH S/O SRI BANESHWAR NATH R/O HOUSE NO. 31 A, RANGPUR PATH, OPPOSITE TO MILIJULI PATH, SATGAON, NOWAPARA, PANJABARI P.S. DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781037, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A CHAMUAH
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 18-07-2023
Page No.# 2/2
Heard Ms. R. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Chamuah, learned counsel for the respondent.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that there is no merit in this revision petition.
Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Pranjal Phukan
Parashar Nath
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
