Kalyan Kalita v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In I.A.(Crl.)/240/2021, the Gauhati High Court disposed of the application due to a connected criminal petition, without granting any specific relief.
In I.A.(Crl.)/240/2021, the Gauhati High Court disposed of the application due to a connected criminal petition, without granting any specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010075372021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/240/2021
KALYAN KALITA
S/O. LATE KAMINI KANTA KALITA, PARTNER, M K STEEL ALLOYS, 26, 2ND FLOOR, ABOVE KANAAH, NEAR SBI WEST GUWAHATI BRANCH, AT ROAD, BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781009
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REP. BY P.P., ASSAM
2:RACHNA PURI W/O. SHRI SUSHEEL PURI R/O. 143-C KALPATRU GARDEN ASHOK NAGAR OFF. RAJGORU FLYOVER P.O. KANDIVALI EAST DIST. MUMBAI MAHARASTRA PIN- 400101
3:SAURAV SHARMA S/O SHRI PRAMOD SHARMA R/O F-42 11TH AVENUE GAURCITY 2 GREATER NOIDA WEST GALLERIA MARKET P.O.-BISHRAKH DIST-GAUTAM BUDHA NAGAR UTTAR PRADESH-20130
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K BHUYAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
O R D E R
17.07.2023
Heard Mr. K. Singha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel representing respondent no.2 as well as Mr. R.R. Kaushik, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
In view of the order passed today in the connected criminal petition, the present application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Kalyan Kalita
State of Assam
Rachna Puri
Saurav Sharma
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court