Sopiar Rahman @ Sofior Rahman v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant sought extension of time to appear before the investigating officer under a prior order, citing delayed receipt of the certified copy. The registry disclosed office closure due to Bihu vacations as a contributing factor. Consequently, the High Court granted an additional one week for compliance. The interim application was disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Further one week's time granted from the date of the order enabling appearance before the investigating officer.