Parag Bora v. Rajesh Kemprai and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the petitioner submitted that the impugned order has been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the case without further orders.
In a contempt proceeding, the petitioner submitted that the impugned order has been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the case without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010018812019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/53/2019
PARAG BORA
S/O- LT HEM KANTA BORA, R/O- BORJOHAGAON, P.O. GHANHI BHATIKURI, P.S. RUPOHI, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
RAJESH KEMPRAI AND 8 ORS. THE COMM. AND SECY., PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT., ASSAM, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:MR. TULIRAM RONGHANG
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU
3:MR. M HAZARIKA
THE PRINCIPAL SECY. THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU DIMA HASAO ASSAM
4:NIROLA PHANGSOPI THE JOINT SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU DIMA HASAO ASSAM
5:PAWAN TERONG
THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER
Page No.# 2/3
PWD (R AND B) HILLS ASSAM DIPHU DIMA-HASAO ASSAM
6:DAMUDAR DEVSARMA THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) HAMREN ELECTRICAL CIRCLE HAMREN
7:SUSHANTA LANGTHASA THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD DIPHU ELECTRICAL DIVISION DIPHU 8:HIBOL SIWARY THE ASSTT. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD HAMREN ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION HAMREN
9:SUSHANTA LANGTHASA THE ASSTT. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD DIPHU ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION DIPHU KARBI ALON
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH (R1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 12-06-2023
Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this
Page No.# 3/3
Court has been complied with and therefore, this contempt case can be closed.
In view of the submission made by the petitioner’s counsel, this contempt case
stands closed.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Parag Bora
Rajesh Kemprai
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court