Disposed
Sudhang Kumar Brahma v. Anurag Goel and 2 Ors.
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/447/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010162152023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010162152023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/2
GAHC010162152023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/447/2023
SUDHANG KUMAR BRAHMA
S/O- LATE RATI RAM BRAHMA, R/O- WARD NO. 5, MIJING NWGWR, P.O. AND P.S. KOKRAJHAR, PIN- 783370, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, ASSAM
VERSUS
ANURAG GOEL AND 2 ORS PRESENTLY SERVING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION, BODOFA NWGWR, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT, KOKRAJHAR, PIN- 783370, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION (BTR), ASSAM
2:ARUN CHANDRA GOSWAMI PRESENTLY SERVING AS CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370 ASSAM 3:MUKUL CH. DAS PRESENTLY SERVING AS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUSHALPUR (ROADS AND BUILDINGS) DIVISION MUSHALPUR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL MUSHALPUR BARAMA MUSHALPUR ROAD DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781372
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K P PATHAK
Page No. 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 09-08-2023
Mr. A. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted after filing of the contempt application, it is learnt that the erstwhile Principal Secretary, BTC, Sri Anurag Goel has, in the meantime, been transferred from the said post. Mr. Baruah has submitted that as a new incumbent has joined in the post of Principal Secretary, BTC, he needs to bring the order which is not allegedly complied with, to the notice of the present incumbent Principal Secretary, BTC. In that view of the matter, he has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the instant contempt petition, with the liberty to file afresh after bringing the concerned order to the notice of the present incumbent Principal Secretary, BTC.
Having regard to the submissions made, this contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for by Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sudhang Kumar Brahma
Anurag Goel and 2 Ors
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court