The Gauhati High Court dropped instant contempt proceedings against the second contemnor upon the submission that demarcation proceedings were completed per a prior order in WP(C) No.3483/2019.
The instant contempt proceedings are dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010271822019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/654/2019
DWIGEN CH. DAS S/O- LATE KALA RAM DAS, VILL- MOKHONIA, P.O- HAJO, DISTKAMRUP(R), ASSAM
VERSUS
KAMAL BAISHYA AND 2 ORS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (R) DISTRICT, AMINGAON, GUWAHATI- 781031
2:KAMAL BARUAH CIRCLE OFFICER HAJO REVENUE CIRCLE P.O AND P.S- HAJO KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN- 781102
3:BHASKAR BARMAN OFFICER IN CHARGE HAJO POLICE STATION P.O AND P.S- HAJO KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN- 78110
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H ANSARI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P P DAS
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
07.08.2023
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Contemnor No.2 submits that the demarcation proceedings have already been completed in terms with the order dated 05.08.02019 passed in WP(C) No.3483/2019.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dwigen Ch. Das
Kamal Baishya
2 Ors.
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
