In contempt proceedings, the Gauhati High Court closed the matter because the petitioner failed to take steps as per an order dated 18.01.2019, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Contempt Proceedings stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010074692018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/188/2018
MUKUTANANDA DAS AND 2 ORS.
S/O. LATE CHIDENANDA DAS, RESIDENT OF BORA SERVICE, GUWAHATI7810076, IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO), ASSAM
2: RAMANANDA DAS
S/O. LATE CHIDENANDA DAS RESIDENT OF BORA SERVICE GUWAHATI-7810076 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM
3: TONMOY DAS
S/O. LATE DHARMANANDA DAS RESIDENT OF BORA SERVICE GUWAHATI-7810076 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO) ASSA
VERSUS
VIRENDRA MITTAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (METRO), GUWAHATI- 781001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R C SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
07.08.2023
It reveals from the Office Note that no steps have been taken by the petitioners in term with the order dated 18.01.2019.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mukutananda Das and 2 Ors.
Virendra Mittal
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
