The Gauhati High Court treated a contempt petition as infructuous and closed the matter without further ado or detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010152602019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/373/2019
MAKADDZ HUSSAIN KAZI
S/O- LATE AFSER HUSSAIN KAZI, R/O- VILL- BIHANPUR, P.OMULARKUCHI, P.S- BELSOR, DIST- NALBARI, PIN- 781303
VERSUS
DHIREN HAZARIKA AND ANR
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GOLAGHAT, DIST- GOLAGHAT, PIN- 785621
2:PUSRAJ SINGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GOLAGHAT PIN- 78562
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K GOGOI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA
ORDER
Date : 08-05-2023
Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case may be
closed as infractuous.
Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel appears for the respondents.
Page No.# 2/2
The contempt petition is accordingly closed as infractuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
MAKADDZ HUSSAIN KAZI
DHIREN HAZARIKA AND ANR; THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GOLAGHAT; PUSRAJ SINGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GOLAGHAT
K. SEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
