The Gauhati High Court, in a contempt petition filed by petitioners against the Deputy Commissioner, allowed the withdrawal of the petition. The court accepted counsel's submission that representation was filed under a prior order and steps are being taken by respondents.
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn and closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC030006052019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/26/2019
ST Beichhuasia and 42 Ors Zawngling, Tuipang, Mizoram 2: M Theno
3: B Nohmua
4: VT Ryuasa
5: L Mali VERSUS
Bhupesh Chaudhury and 3 Ors. Siaha, Mizoram 2:Sh. Kesavan R Deputy Commissioner Siaha District
3:Sh. Lalsangliana Deputy Commissioner Deputy COmmissioner Siaha District
4:Sh.Lalhmunsanga Hnamte Deputy Commissioner Siaha District Siah
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte, for R1 to R3
Page No.# 2/4
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/13/2021
ST. Beichhuasia Zawngling
2: M Theo Zawngling Tuipang Mizoram 3: B Nohmua Zawngling Tuipang Mizoram
4: VT Ryuasa Zawngling Tuipang Mizoram
5: L. Maila Zawngling Tuipang Mizoram VERSUS
The Deputy Commissioner Siaha District
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinary T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/52/2022
Sh. S.T. Beichhuasia and 42 Ors. Zawngling Siaha District Mizoram
Page No.# 3/4
VERSUS
Sh. Bhupesh Chaudhury Deputy Commissioner Siaha District and Anr. Siaha Siaha District Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/42/2023
S.T.Beichhuasia and 42 Ors Zawngling Mizoram
VERSUS Sh Bhupesh Chaudhury and 2 Ors. Deputy Commissioner Siaha District Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte
Page No.# 4/4
B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER
06.06.2023
(Tuesday)
Heard Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu, learned counsel for the petitioners along with Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1-3.
Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she may be allowed to withdraw the contempt petition since they have filed their representation in terms of the Judgment & Order dated. 01.11.2018 in W.P.(C) No. 130/2018 and it appears that steps are being taken by the respondents in the matter.
In view of the above submission, the contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn and closed accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
S.T. Beichhuasia and 42 Ors.
Sh. Bhupesh Chaudhury
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
