The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter after hearing counsel for the parties who mutually consented to the postponement by one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030001912023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.A./20/2023
Smt. Laltlandiki Zawknuam, Vengpui, Mamit District
VERSUS
State of Mizoram and Anr. Aizawl2:The Officer-in-Charge Anti-Narcotics Squad Aizawl Mizoram Aizaw
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Reuben Lalrinsanga
Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram
Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/28/2023
Smt. Laltlandiki Zawlnuam Vengpui Mamit District Mizoram
VERSUS
State of Mizoram and Anr. Aizawl 2:The Officer-in-Charge
Page No.# 2/2
Anti-Narcotics Squad Aizawl Mizoram Aizawl
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Reuben Lalrinsanga Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP Mizoram
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER
25.02.2025
Heard Ms. L.K. Hmangaihzuali, learned counsel for the appellant, who has prayed for adjournment of the matter with the consent of the learned counsel for the respondent.
In view of the above, list the matter after 1 (one) week.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smt. Laltlandiki Zawknuam
State of Mizoram and Anr.
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
