The Gauhati High Court dismissed a bail application noting that the charge-sheet was already filed in the connected trial case. The court directed the applicant to seek bail from the Trial Court.
Bail application dismissed; direction to apply for bail before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010014972023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./588/2023
MD MAJIBUR RAHMAN@MUJIBUR RAHMAN S/O- LT. MOIN UDDIN RESIDENT OF VILL.- PIRRO CHOCK P/S- KARIMGANJ DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PRESENT ADDRESS- MIDLAND COLONY P/S- DIMAPUR EAST PS DIST- DIMAPUR NAGALAND.
VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR. U K BARMAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
Date : 19.05.2023
Heard Mr. M. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam.
It is submitted by Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam that charge-sheet has been submitted in the case vide C.S. No. 29/2023, dated 13.05.2023 in connection
Page No.# 2/2
with Guwahati GRPS Case No. 163/2022.
In view of the above, the bail application stands dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to apply for bail before the learned Trial Court, if so advised. If such bail application is filed, the same shall be disposed off in accordance with law.
This disposes off the bail application.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application be allowed despite charge-sheet already being submitted in the pending trial proceedings.
MD MAJIBUR RAHMAN@MUJIBUR RAHMAN
THE STATE OF ASSAM
AJIT BORTHAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
