The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous following the submission of the Final Report. The earlier interim order granting bail was vacated, disposing of the matter.
The anticipatory bail application closed; interim order dated 31.03.2023 vacated; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010012242023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/284/2023
DHARITRI BORA @ RANI BORA @ BARSHA BORA W/O- SHAH BADSHA ALI, R/O- RAJGARH, GUWAHATI, P.S. CHANDMARI, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781003.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
17.05.2023
Heard Mr. S.A. Ahmed. , learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.
It is submitted by Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. that Final Report has
Page No.# 2/2
been submitted in the case vide F.R. No. 5/2023, dated 28.02.2023 in connection with Doboka P.S. Case No. 1/2023.
In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application stands closed being infructuous.
The interim order, dated 31.03.2023 stands vacated.
This disposes off the anticipatory bail application.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be closed as infructuous upon submission of the Final Report.
Whether the interim order granting bail should be vacated.
Dharitri Bora @ Rani Bora @ Barsha Bora W/O- Shah Badsha Ali
The State of Assam Represented by the P.P., Assam
Ajit Borthakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
