In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner's counsel submitted that the applicant did not wish to press the application. The court dismissed the bail application as not pressed.
Bail application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010089672023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1526/2023
ARSOB ALI
S/O LATE KODOM ALI R/O VILL- KILLAHARA PART-V, P.S. CHUNARI DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
13/06/2023
Heard Mr. A Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
This application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Arsob Ali , seeking bail in connection with Chapar P.S. Case No. 344/2021 registered under Section 302 IPC, wherein he was arrested on 12.03.2023 and since then he is in custody.
Page No.# 2/2
During the deliberation of the matter, Mr. A Rahman, learned counsel on instructions submitted that the petitioner does not want to press this bail application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this bail application, being not pressed, stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail in the instant application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ARSOB ALI
THE STATE OF ASSAM
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
